Your chance to provide Spryker Product Feedback

Elena Leonova

What are the top 3 things that you appreciate about Spryker Product?
And what are the top 3 things that you don’t and it needs to be addressed?

Guido X Jansen

Recurring things I hear about (skewed towards forum/developer topics because those I interact with most):

👍 Long term maintainability
👍 Easy to onboard, just plain PHP, good structure/logic

—

👎 LINK middleware > solved by our new Alumio-powered Middleware!
👎 Documentation not up-to-date
👎 Github PRs are not processed (solved since last month for core and Oryx bugfixes, but was a very common complaint)

s.kroll

👍 Almost everything is possible to develop when you take Spryker as a highly extendable and customizable framework
👍 Great docker/sdk which makes developer's live a lot easier in comparison to other technologies where you often have to build your own (local) hosting stack

-

👎 Lots of effort to keep a project up-to-date, even during initial project-phase / development
👎 Missing comfort-features which are common in Symfony (autowiring,…)