I used Spryk a bit and wonder what it really can do. I added a client and it created 4 files for me.

UM4BZSK7T

I used Spryk a bit and wonder what it really can do. I added a client and it created 4 files for me. Okay nice and no need to type the namespaces. Still for example the Zed stub was something I still had to write. So did I miss something or is Spryk rather shallow in that it can do?

UK5DS29L2

depends what you're after, maybe you're looking for code:generate:module:all instead?

UK5DS29L2

UM4BZSK7T

Thanks got to look at that. But there is nothing to let's say add a controller and it's actions?

UK5DS29L2

I think it would be way too complicated to add tool and validator for it and it is simper to follow the docs on this now

UK5DS29L2

https://documentation.spryker.com/tutorials/introduction/tutorial-hello-world-scos.htm
https://documentation.spryker.com/tutorials/advanced/t-add-new-bundle.htm
specifically

Denis Turkov

@UL67Q1HGF do you think controller/action templates could cause a problem?

Denis Turkov

@UK5DS29L2 Spryks are more flexible code generators, every part could be inherited while introducing dedicated Spryk for a project use-case.
When do you think old code generators are handier?

UK5DS29L2

@UJ8Q2T36E when you need less time to get what you need. Simply genrating whole module and removing unnecessary parts is faster than writing a spryk that doesn't exist

Denis Turkov

aha, I see. Probably an "all-in" Spryk is just missing.
Thank you for the fast feedback!