What are the Slack Archives?
It’s a history of our time together in the Slack Community! There’s a ton of knowledge in here, so feel free to search through the archives for a possible answer to your question.
Because this space is not active, you won’t be able to create a new post or comment here. If you have a question or want to start a discussion about something, head over to our categories and pick one to post in! You can always refer back to a post from Slack Archives if needed; just copy the link to use it as a reference..
Hello, a question: why the Product List Merchant Relationship relation is provided via `f
Hello,
a question: why the Product List <-> Merchant Relationship relation is provided via fk_merchant_relationship
direct in spy_product_list
table instead with a dedicated n2n relations table?
We have i.e. ca. 50.000 Companies and ca. 20 Blacklist Product List.. The product list i.e. A is the same for Company 1 and Company 2. With this relation i have to create 2 different product lists exactly the same.
With a relations table it will be enough to create the same product list one time and just relate to merchant-relationship.
Has anyone the same problem or just find another solution about it or i have necessarily create a single product list for every merchant relationship?
(naturally implicit is that the product lists are the same for all).
Comments
-
Is it your topic @UT9PVABFB and @UKBTMFXMJ?
0 -
As I know that it was fixed by @UP5GJTY58 and the b2b team (but fk_merchant_relationship wasn't removed for BC)
0 -
@UKBTMFXMJ it means that exists another relation table for the relations? If yes, in which version of merchantRelationship bundle?
0 -
I see only this relation in the last version of merchant-relationship-product-list bundle -> https://github.com/spryker/merchant-relationship-product-list/blob/1.3.0/src/Spryker/Zed/MerchantRelationshipProductList/Persistence/Propel/Schema/spy_product_list.schema.xml
0 -
-
but let me ask more details
0 -
ok, thanks @UKBTMFXMJ
0 -
update: fk_merchant_relationship is optional from the latest changes, but the structure is the same, no n2n table. So your question is still valid.
0 -
yes.. so i ve seen too..
Is there smth planned about it or not? Because the actual relation is very bad for great b2b customer as us..
0 -
Hi @UL65CH0MC
Fixing this it’s not in the short term roadmap, increasing b2b performance will be a big topic and we are working to clarify a scope for it. As far as I can see you need the solution right away so I could say that, for now, it should be done on the project level, but if you will add this issue to our IDEA portal https://spryker.ideas.aha.io/ideas - it will help a lot to push this topic into the scoping session faster0 -
Hi @UT9PVABFB thank u.. I will evaluate this extension for us on pyz level..
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 42 Getting Started & Guidelines
- 7 Getting Started in the Community
- 8 Additional Resources
- 7 Community Ideas and Feedback
- 76 Spryker News
- 927 Developer Corner
- 785 Spryker Development
- 88 Spryker Dev Environment
- 362 Spryker Releases
- 3 Oryx frontend framework
- 35 Propel ORM
- 68 Community Projects
- 3 Community Ideation Board
- 30 Hackathon
- 3 PHP Bridge
- 6 Gacela Project
- 26 Job Opportunities
- 3.2K 📜 Slack Archives
- 116 Academy
- 5 Business Users
- 370 Docker
- 551 Slack General
- 2K Help
- 75 Knowledge Sharing
- 6 Random Stuff
- 4 Code Testing
- 32 Product & Business Questions
- 70 Spryker Safari Questions
- 50 Random